Define your street photography style

 

It is often easy to recognize the pictures of great street photographers such as HCB, Winogrand, Kertész or Moryiama. Yet you might ask yourself, why is it so ? It is probably because they all had a distinctive style and their pictures were taken with a consistent approach and technique.
It does probably take a long time to come to a style, and the beginner photographer often gets lost in the large  variety of subjects, techniques and equipment available in this vast discipline. Even some long term photographers have a difficulty to appraise what defines their style, and some simply do not feel the need to have one. Obviously, there is no need to have only one style and stick to it through your existence. Different styles might apply to the different types of photography and it will evolve with the phases of one’s life.
Nevertheless, I do think that building a style and working on it is important for street photographers. It will help you create a body of work that corresponds to your vision of the world and make it become distinctive. Indeed, imagine how wonderful if you heard someone say “This is a Dupont shot” while reviewing a selection of pictures where one of yours would be included.

Yet coming back to reality, the first step is evidently to define what makes up a style. The points below should help you identify whether you already have one, or give you some hints on how to create one.

A) Themes / subjects

When hitting the street for the first times, it is obviously tempting to start shooting any kind of scenes that unfolds under our eyes. Dogs, bikes, grandmothers, lovers, waiters, … , everything is a good subject for a picture as it is the nature of street photography. Yet when you look at some of the master’s work, you’ll actually notice that they often had a few recurring themes : Winogrand’s women, Saul Leiter’s reflections, Boubat’s kids or Erwitt’s dogs are well known examples. Evidently, these photographers shot a lot of different themes during their life, nevertheless they all did focus on a few of them at a given point.
So ask yourself what are the subjects / scenes that you especially like to shoot and try to put a bit more focus on it for some time. They might be very simple or kind of odd, but we all have some preferences in what we shoot while in the street. In my Paris years, I always paid special attention to people wearing hats and women dressed in red. Also any scene which had a feel of mystery would grab my attention. I do not really know why it was so but my eyes would immediately lock on these subjects as they appeared. (and if you do have a psychological explanation for it,  do not hesitate to let me know).

The shots below show that even currently in Madrid, some of my Parisian themes remain.

Leica M9 with 50mm Summicron at F2.0, 1/4000, ISO200

Leica M9 with 35mm Lux Asph at F2.0, 1/3000, ISO200

B) Processing

Be it the film you elect or the post-processing you apply to your pictures, it makes up an important part of your style. And I’d say it is probably  the point where most photographers have a difficult time in applying a consistent approach. Digital made it very easy to change a picture aspect in a few seconds. One moment, a given shot is in colors and the next one it is in B&W. All of that to sometimes finally end up as Polaroid-like image. It is therefore very tempting to experiment and apply all kind of different looks to our pictures. While experimentation is good, I think it is equally important for a photographer to stick to one or a few processing routines. It can evidently evolve with time, but choose a look you like and build a body of work with it for some time. Also think that some of the best photographers shot a whole career with a film type and used the services of the same lab for every shot they took. There was a good reason behind that, they knew it was a distinctive element of their style of photography.

The shots below illustrated how my processing evolved during the last three years). Yet at the same type, it kept some of its main characteristics. (desaturation, high contrast, thin depth of field)

Leica M8 with 90mm Elmar at F4.0, 1/500, ISO160

Leica M9 with 35mm Lux Asph at F1.4, 1/2000, ISO160

3) Equipment selection

Whether you use a 21mm or a 50mm lens, it will have a huge impact on the look of your pictures. Indeed, the distortion, compression and depth of field will vary a lot depending on the focal you select. It will also determine the amount of information you will include in a scene, as wider focals usually allow for more elements to be included in the frame. Some of the best photographers used a single focal length throughout their career, ie Winogrand’s 28mm or HCB’s 50mm, and it became a distinctive feature of their style. Meanwhile if you use a zoom or several prime lenses, your shots will be spread among the range of focal length. It doesn’t mean you’ll take worse pictures, yet the corresponding field of views won’t be a characteristic of your style.
The camera you use will also impact your style, since the rendering of a large format camera will differ substantially from a Point & Shoot camera. The use of flash might also be a characteristic of your style, as well as a perference for very fast lenses (ie, F1.4 and faster)

In the pictures below, note the impact of the focal length on field of view and distortion between a 28mm and 50mm lens.

Leica M9 with CV28mm Ultron at F2.0, 1/750, ISO200


Leica M9 with 50mm Summicron at F2.0, 1/1000, ISO160

4) Composition

The way you compose your shots is probably the trait that will impact the most your style. Are there characteristics that are recurrent in your portfolio ?
- up in your subject’s face or  from some distance.
- complex multi subjects composition or single subject street portraits.
- use of bent horizon lines or classic rule of thirds constructions
- multi planes or single planes.
- high or low vantage point

Evidently, composing all your pictures the same way would soon result quite boring, yet a certain homogeneity in your framings will certainly help the viewer go through a series of your pictures.

The first show below illustrates the high vantage point I like to use in my photography (taking advantage of my height). The second shot is a more complex multi subjects composition.


Leica M9 with 35mm Lux Asph at F2.8, 1/1500, ISO160

Leica M9 with 35mm Lux Asph at F8.0, 1/750, ISO160

5) Feeling / message

Here we get to the intangible part of your style which is the feelings or messages that your street photography conveys.  Think about the poetry of Kertész, the crude street portraits of Bruce Gilden, and the social analysis behind Martin Parr’s shot. What is your street photography about, what vision of the world do you propose to your viewers ? Is it just a series of of travel book pictures, or does it include a personal set of beliefs, be them social, cultural, or religious.

Lyricism and mystery, humanist with a touch of humour is how I would describe my photography. What about yours ? Can you put words to it ?
Leica M9 with 35mm Lux Asph at F1.4, 1/2000, ISO160

Leica M9 with 50mm Summicron at F5.6, 1/750, ISO160


Leica M9 with 350mm Lux Asph at F1.4, 1/2000, ISO160

Final words

As you can see, the components of a style are many. And by being so, it is not easy to integrate all these elements in a consistent manner. There is also a large part of unconsciousness in the creation of a style. Indeed, unless one spends a long time reviewing its portfolio (with possible help), it is sometimes difficult to detect the patterns as they start to appear. Yet once they do appear, I strongly encourage you to go deeper into them for a while. Try to see if you can develop a true style around it. It does not mean you’ll have to close your horizon to the many shot opportunities out there, yet adding some coherence and consistency to your street photography will result rewarding. Both for yourself and your viewers.

  20 Responses to “Define your street photography style”

  1. Interesting read, Yanick! Have been thinking of this, too, quite a bit lately. Being able to offer something unique and adopting a particular style, or at least knowing what one likes and going about photography in a very deliberate way, I think not only makes it all the more rewarding but is more or less a necessity these days (btw i’m only 21 ;)) to stand out and aquire a sense of recognition.

  2. My favorites are people reading, mostly newspapers. Does that count as style?

  3. It is interesting to think of ones style this had not really occured to me for some reason, except for recognising others style..You have a very strong style that I like and recognise so well.. the elevated position you like I had noticed only unconciously though it is strong, a look I really like.

    Thanks very much for this article which makes my little mind think, this is also your style.

  4. I have been asking myself what is my style – unfortunately I have yet to find one but I am getting closer and closer.

    Great article Yanidel!

  5. Hi Yanick,

    While I too generally have a common subject matter for my street photography, I am far from having developed a style. Perhaps there are common themes in my work, but I feel there is no uniting style, yet. This article is an inspiration. Thank you.

    Regards
    Charles

  6. Hi Yanick, great read, inspiring! Keep the good work up. Hope you enjoy Spain!
    matt

  7. I am attracted by people in hats too :)
    Great article as always, will definitely bring some thinking into what I shoot

  8. Great article. An incoherent portfolio, even with good photos, always leaves me a bit cold.

    I agree especially with the unconscious part which will only come out when you clear your mind of preconceptions on what you must photograph. I’m sure Winogrand was naturally drawn to women (can’t blame him) as Erwitt was to dogs etc… so I don’t think it was a conscious effort.

    Regards
    Steve

  9. Dear Yanick, I fully agree with what you wrote. But it happens to all of us who shoots a lot of street photography. Your style change over time, by having a new camera, a new lens or even some new taste in processing. I even figured out in New York last week that I will make much more photos in color than I have ever done so far. I guess the old school photographers at that time were so consistent as there were not too many cameras available and also they were not influence by so many other photographers on the Internet. Styles changes much faster today as they did in the old days, but that’s something I like sometimes. The only problem is, when you want to show a portfolio to someone it should at least look a bit consistent in color and style where I sometimes might have a problem.

    See yourself how my photos look different: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomasleuthard

    P.S. Just do what you want to do and do it always the same way. Have just one camera and a prime lens, a processing pre-set and you are good. Don’t mess around with too much equipment, it will blur your style…

    • Hi Thomas, thanks for stopping by. I greatly enjoyed your website and collaborations with Eric Kim (and I believe we are both citizens of the same country ;) )

      I wonder if 50 years from now, the best photographers of our times will be remembered for their overall contribution to photography (including many different styles due to the ease of change brought by digital), or for a period of their activity and a selected style.Take Martin Parr, the only work I can distinguish from him is his tourists series with mostly “in your face” shots. What about the remainder of his work, will it also be remembered ? I am not so sure.
      Many of the past greats had indeed less ability to change style, and maybe it served them. Look at HCB global body of work or WInogrand, I feel it is their overall consistency in style that I love (even if small evolution existed), whatever the period or topic. I wonder what their work would have looked like if they were born in the digital ages … ;)

  10. Could I get away with saying my style is ‘eclectic’?

  11. Hey, just came to say that this is a great post! Normally I follow your blong on a "silent" way but this good writing/photography was a delight! Cheers 

  12. I am fresher in the field of photography…. Can u suggest me a good camera model?

  13. First of all, love your corner! I know its been a while you wrote this piece, and I'm obviously a bit late over here, but it struck a chord. I'm currently in the process of identifying the same having started my journey in a rather indiscriminate fashion. I would also add that somehow trying identifying the dominant style also informs one of the real strengths as against the perceived ones – an important exercise for beginners like me.

  14. Your post, Define your street photography style » Yanidel Street Photography was really content rich and straight forward for me to understand.

  15.  
    Hi Yanick,
    Great article! I love your work, recently started following your blog. Not sure if I have a notable style. I like to take moody pictures if I can, as mood is down to interpretation this is sometimes lost in the work, but my pictures rarely look happy or uplifting. You might disagree http://www.flickr.com/photos/ropaz
     
    Whilst reading this article, I realized that I have recently been using the exact aspect ratio and post processing techniques for mostly everything I do.
    Where in the past, I would crop as the picture dictates, now, if I have to crop the aspect ratio will never change.
     
    hasta la Victoria siempre!

  16. tşk ederiz güzel bir yazı

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>